Detection of financial and non-financial factors affecting the acceptance of going concern opinion

Ery Yanto, S.E., Ak., M.Ak., Stasya Monifa

Abstract


Financial statements are source of information for investors in determining which companies to invest in. Therefore, the reliability of financial statements has an important role. In order for financial reports to be reliable, there are two important things, namely reporting quality and earning quality factors. The auditor gives a fair opinion as a form of reporting quality. Thus, the going concern opinion is one of the opinions given by the auditor on earning quality. This study tries to examine what factors encourage the auditor to give going concern opinion to the company. The method used is a quantitative method using inferential statistics. In particular, the instrument used is logistic regression. The findings of this study are that companies that tend to get a going concern opinion have certain characteristics, among others, are large companies that have profits and have a fairly high level of debt. This finding can then be used by investors to identify companies that have the potential to get a going concern opinion.

 


Keywords


going concern opinion; company size; profitability ratio; leverage ratio; auditor size; and risky company

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blay, A. D., & Geiger, M. A. (2013). Auditor fees and auditor independence: Evidence from going-concern reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 579–606.

Bruynseels, L., Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (2011). Auditor differentiation, mitigating management actions, and audit-reporting accuracy for distressed firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(1), 1-20. doi:10.2308/aud.2011.30.1.1

Chatterjee, S., & Simonoff, J. S. (2013). Handbook of regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Diab, A. A., Abdelazim, S. I., Eissa, A. M., Abozaid, E. M., & Elshaabany, M. M. (2021). The impact of client size and financial performance on audit opinion: Evidence from a developing market. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 228. doi:10.36941/ajis-2021-0020

Durbin Watson test & test statistic. (2021, August 15). Retrieved from https://www.statisticshowto.com/durbin-watson-test-coefficient/

Durbin-Watson test. (2018, March 10). Retrieved from https://www.real-statistics.com/multiple-regression/autocorrelation/durbin-watson-test/

Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2014). Do Big 4 auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 197-219. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50792

Feldmann, D. A., & Read, W. J. (2010). Auditor conservatism after Enron. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 267-278. doi:10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.267

Ghozali, Imam. (2018). Aplikasi analisis mulivariate dengan program SPSS 25 (sembilan). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson College Division.

Hossain, M., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2020). Abnormal disclosure tone and going concern modified audit reports. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(4), 106764. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106764

Ittonen, K., Tronnes, P. C., & Wong, L. (2017). Substantial doubt and the entropy of auditors’ going concern modifications. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(2), 134-147. doi:10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.005

International standard on auditing (ISA) 570 (Revised), going concern. (2020, June Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-auditing-isa-570-revised-going-concern-3

Kaplan, S. E., & Williams, D. D. (2012). The changing relationship between audit firm size and going concern reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), 322-341. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.05.002

Kuruppu, N., Laswad, F., & Oyelere, P. (2012). Assessing going concern. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(1), 33-50. doi:10.1108/01140581211221542

Laitinen, E. K. (2018). Financial reporting: Long-term change of financial ratios. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 08(09), 1893-1927. doi:10.4236/ajibm.2018.89128

Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259-286. doi:10.2308/accr.00000009

Linck, J., Netter, J., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure☆. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308-328. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.004

Low and high risk SIC codes for business credit |. (2021, September 8). Retrieved from https://www.creditsuite.com/blog/which-sic-codes-get-you-denied/

Meiryani, Warganegara, D. L., Fernando, E., Riantono, I. E., & Tumiwa, A. H. (2021). The effect of financial distress and auditor's reputation on going concern audit opinion study on manufacturing companies. 2021 7th International Conference on E-Business and Applications. doi:10.1145/3457640.3457661

Bob D.C. (2020, April 03). Going concern tips for auditors during the pandemic. December 15, 2021, from https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2020/apr/going-concern-tips-for-auditors-during-coronavirus-pandemic.html

Ruiz-Barbadillo †, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., De Fuentes-Barberá, C., & García-Benau, M. A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 13(4), 597-620. doi:10.1080/0963818042000216820

Schmuck, M. (2013). Financial distress and corporate turnaround: An empirical analysis of the automotive supplier industry. Springer Science & Business Media.

Tsipouridou, M., & Spathis, C. (2014). Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece. Accounting Forum, 38(1), 38-54. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2013.09.002

Vichitsarawong, T., & Pornupatham, S. (2015). Do audit opinions reflect earnings persistence? Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(3), 244-276. doi:10.1108/maj-12-2013-0973

Webster, A. (2013). Introductory regression analysis: With computer application for business and economics. Routledge.

Widarjono, Agus. (2015). Analisis Multivariat Terapan dengan Program SPSS, amos, dan SmartPLS Edisi Kedua. UPP STIM YKPN. Yogyakarta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jaaf.v6i1.3616

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Mailing Address

Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Kota Jababeka, Cikarang Baru, Bekasi 17550 - Indonesia

Mail Address

jaaf@president.ac.id

 

ISSN 2580-1791 (Print)

ISSN 2615-8051 (Online)

View My Stats

flag

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JAAF (Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance) is indexed in:

Current accreditation SINTA 4