Construction Delays Analysis in the Kampung Akuarium Flats Project, Penjaringan-Jakarta

Intan Dian Amalia, Eddy Triyanto Sudjatmiko, Anaconda Bangkara

Abstract


The most common impediment to project work is a delay in implementing work activities. Even though the completion time has been calculated, there are several influencing factors, such as natural factors that cannot be predicted, late material delivery, a lack of workers that are not optimal when doing project work, and insufficient funds. In this case, the construction project of the Kampung Akuarium flats in Penjaringan area of North Jakarta was delayed from both technical and non-technical. The objective of this study is to identify the factors causing the project delays and the delay time of the project. This research was conducted by collecting data obtained and processed using Microsoft Project 2019 and the Critical Path Method (CPM) to help identify the problems. From the results that have been analyzed, critical paths include the structural work, finishing architecture 3rd floor, finishing architecture 4th floor, and finishing architecture 5th floor. If not completed immediately or delayed during implementation, the entire project schedule will be delayed. This has an effect where the initial contract plan was completed in 182 days to 259 days with a difference of 77 days or 11 weeks.


Keywords


delay analysis, flats, Kampung Akuarium, Critical Path Method, Microsoft Project

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. Darmawan, L. Saputra, and Andi, “Penggunaan Microsoft Project untuk Analisa Keterlambatan Pekerjaan Struktur Suatu Proyek dengan Metode Time Impact Analysis,” Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 259-266, 2019. (In Indonesian)

K. Kim, "Generalized Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method Improve Sustainability in Construction Project Scheduling," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 8918, 2020.

S. H. Jo, E. B. Lee, and K. Y. Pyo, “Integrating a Procurement Management Process into Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM): A Case-Study on Oil and Gas Projects, The Piping Process.” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1817, 2018.

J. E. Kelley, The Critical-Path Method: Resource Planning and Scheduling. In Industrial Scheduling. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1963.

G. W. Pragasi, Analisis Pengaruh Keterlambatan Terhadap Biaya Pelaksanaan Proyek dengan Menggunakan Tracking pada MS Project (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Dinas Sosial Kota Blitar Tahun 2013), Brawijaya University, 2016. (In Indonesian)

A. R. Sugiarto, M. H. Hasyim, and S. E. Unas, “Analisis Risiko dari Penggunaan Kurva-S dalam Monitoring Proyek Gedung-X di Kota Batu,” Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknik Sipil, 2016. (In Indonesian)

N. Rosanti, E. Setiawan, and A. Ayuningtyas (2016), “Penggunaan Metode Jalur Kritis pada Manajemen Proyek (Studi Kasus: PT. Trend Communications International),” Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23-30, 2016. (In Indonesian)

I. Agustiar and R. Handrianto, “Evaluasi Penjadwalan Proyek Menggunakan Metode CPM dan Kurva S,” Wahana Teknik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 99-105, 2018. (In Indonesian)

M. Mazlum and A. F. Güneri, “CPM, PERT and Project Management with Fuzzy Logic Technique and Implementation on a Business,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 210, pp. 348-357, 2015.

J. Santiago and D. Maggalon, Critical path method. CEE 320-VDC Seminar, 2009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/pcej.v1i2.4756

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


President University Press

Lembaga Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

President University

Jalan Ki Hajar Dewantara, Mekarmukti, Bekasi

Jawa Barat, Indonesia 17530