- Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charge
- Screening for Plagiarism Policy
- Become an Editor/Reviewer
- Frequently Asked Questions
Focus and Scope
- Communication, Media, and Cultural Studies
- Political Communication
- Public Relations
- Marketing Communication
- Organizational Communication
- Social Media Management
- Communication Management
- Film Studies
- Communication Technology
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Peer Review Process
Every article that goes to the editorial desk will go through Initial Review processes by the Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to a minimum of two peer-reviewers for a blind review process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes usually take four weeks.
Peer reviewers in this online journal have experiences in communications research and publishing in reputable national and/or international publications.
Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi publishes at least 6 articles both in April and November every year. Each accepted article will be published online as soon as they are ready. All accepted articles will be published in the printed version journal.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi adopts the following publication ethics based on COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines to take all possible measures against malpractice and to ensure best practices in publication ethics. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the Author(s), the Chief Editor, the Editorial Board, and the Reviewers.
Duties of Editors
The Editors of Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its significance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's Editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Thus, one of the Editors has to run each accepted article through Turnitin Plagiarism Checker prior to publication. The Editors may confer with other Editors or Reviewers in making this decision.
An Editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content and current issues regardless race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political stance of the Author(s).
The Editor and any Editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding Author(s), Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other Editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an Editor's own research without an expressed and explicit written consent of the Author(s).
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the Editor in making Editorial decisions and through the Editorial communications with the Author(s) may also assist the Author(s) in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse themself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the Author(s) is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the Author(s). Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the Editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the Author(s), companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Author(s)
Author(s) of original research report(s) should present an accurate account of the work performed, and also an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The Author(s) should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the Author(s) have used the works and/or words of others that these have been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An Author(s) should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the works of others must always be given. Author(s) should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as Co-author(s). Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding Author(s) should ensure that all appropriate Co-author(s) and no inappropriate Co-author(s) are included on the paper and that all Co-author(s) has/have seen and approved the final version of the paper, and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All Author(s) should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When the Author(s) discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal Editor or publisher and cooperate with the Editor to retract or make amends or necessary revision on the paper.
Article Processing Charge
Expose Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi does not charge any fee for article submission, processing, or publication.
Article submission charge
Article processing charge
Article publication charge
Screening for Plagiarism Policy
Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi has a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Anti-Plagiarism Software "Turnitin" to check the authenticity article.
Become an Editor/Reviewer
Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is open for any researcher who wants to contribute to our journal as editorial member and reviewer. As a member of the journal, you will get:
- Assignment letter (by request)
- Certificate per issue
Please fill out the following link: Google Form.
Frequently Asked Questions
Apakah naskah saya bisa dipublikasikan di Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi?
Bisa, selama naskah Anda relevan dengan diskusi di bidang ilmu komunikasi. Silakan merujuk pada Focus and Scope.
Berapa lama proses review berlangsung?
Proses review adalah proses yang panjang dan bisa memakan waktu hingga 12 minggu tergantung dari kesediaan reviewer yang ditugaskan. Kami berupaya agar proses review bisa selesai dalam waktu 8 minggu. Kebijakan review dapat dilihat di sini.
Apakah tersedia jalur fast-track review?
Jalur fast-track tidak tersedia di jurnal kami.
Saat ini naskah saya statusnya masih In Review dan saya perlu LoA untuk syarat kelulusan. Apakah saya bisa mendapat LoA?
LoA hanya diterbitkan apabila naskah telah direview, direvisi, dan naskah hasil revisi telah disetujui oleh Editor untuk diterbitkan.
Bagaimana sistem penerbitannya?
Saat ini kami menerbitkan enam artikel per terbitan. Naskah yang terbit adalah naskah yang sudah lebih dulu siap dipublikasikan.
Bagaimana penjadwalan terbitan naskah?
Naskah yang sudah siap terbit bisa langsung dipublikasikan (publish as you go) sebelum bulan terbit. Jadwal penerbitan sepenuhnya ditentukan oleh Editor.
Berapa biaya yang harus saya bayar untuk publikasi di Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi?
Saat ini publikasi di jurnal kami belum dikenakan biaya. Namun, naskah dalam bahasa Inggris akan dikenakan biaya proofreading tambahan sesuai kebijakan rekanan proofreader kami.
Apakah saya bisa menggunakan jasa proofreading lain?
Bisa, dengan melampirkan bukti sertifikat proofreading. Kami sangat merekomendasikan untuk menggunakan jasa proofreader kami yang sudah berpengalaman.