ONLINE/VIRTUAL ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT STUDENTS: THE CHALLENGES AND COPING MECHANISM

Joy N. Nejar

Abstract


This study examined the online/virtual academic performance of Hospitality Management Students based on the level of challenges and coping mechanisms. The level of challenges and coping mechanisms the hospitality management students experienced during the synchronous and asynchronous learning with Wi-Fi connection and data connection was determined, and how it affected their academic performances. The respondents of this study were the 202 Hospitality Management Students of Iloilo Science and Technology University, Miagao Campus, composed of second-year to fourth-year level students. The survey questionnaire comprised three sections: the profile of the participants, the challenges in synchronous and asynchronous learning, and the coping mechanism in synchronous and asynchronous learning. It was hypothesized that there is no significant difference between the challenges and coping mechanisms in Hospitality Management Students in synchronous and asynchronous learning. 



Full Text:

PDF

References


Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student's learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.

Almarabeh, T., Majdalawi, Y. & Mohammad, H. (2016). Internet Usage, Challenges, and Attitudes among University Students: Case Study of the University of Jordan. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 9, 577–587. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2016.912039.

Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, 113–115. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191

Barrot, J.S., Llenares, I.I. & del Rosario, L.S. Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Educ Inf Technol 26, 7321–7338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social–cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 _ 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, pp. 80, 501–519.

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Sebastian, S. (2021). Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Setting of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Front. Psychol., 11 October 2021, Sec. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554

Gopal, R., Singh, V. & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID-19. Educ Inf Technol 26, 6923–6947 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, O., Trust, T., & Bond, V. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSEreview (2020)

Kwaah, C., & Essilfie, G. (2017). Stress and Coping Strategies among Distance Education Students at the University of Cape Cost, Ghana. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE July 2017 ISSN 1302-6488 Volume: 18 Number: 3 Article 8

Rukmana D. (2014) Quota Sampling. In: Michalos A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/icfbe.v0i0.5722

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office:

Faculty of Business President University 
Jalan Ki Hajar Dewantara Mekarmukti
Cikarang Utara, Bekasi, Jawa Barat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.