CONCEPT OF GLOBAL HEALTH DIPLOMACY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Laode Muhamad Fathun, Nurmasari Situmeang

Abstract


This paper's purpose is to explain describes the correlation of the spread of the Covid19 virus as a global problem. The spread will form a global health diplomacy collaboration to tackle Covid19 massive spread that makes countries overwhelmed to overcome it. This paper is used for library research to research methodology with qualitative descriptive analysis paradigm. This paper result to finds that to overcome these problems, each country must interpret that international mismarked security is more important than the political and economic interests of the country. That means that cooperation must be interpreted that the Covid19 outbreak is a global problem, must be handled by multiple stakeholders, long term, and cooperation based on the nature of extremism. With the ready ness negotiation method. This interpretation is expected to be an inclusive way to be able to respond to cooperation that understands, shares, and enjoys together with global health diplomacy as to develop international governance cooperation with altruism model and ready ness negotiation.


Keywords


Covid19, global health diplomacy, altruism, readyness

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Books

Babulal Sethia, P. K. (2019). Essentials of Global Health. Poland: Elsevier.

Buzan, B. (1998). Security A New Framework For Analysis. New York: Lynne Rienner Inc.

Carlnaes, W. (2013). Handbook Hubungan Internasional. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Colin Mcinnes, K. L. (2012). Global Health International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design. London: SAGE.

Hansen, B. B. (2009). The Evolution of international studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hubert, R. M. (2001). Human Security and The New Diplomacy Protecting People Promoting Peace. Canada: Mc GillUniversity Press.

Ilona Kickbusch, G. L. (2013). Global Health Diplomacy Concept, Issue, Actors Instrument, Fora and Cases. New York: Springer.

Kelman, I. (2012). Disaster Diplomacy, How Disaster Effect peace and conflict. New York: Routledge.

Newman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods. New York: Palgrave Macmilan.

Sara E Davies, A. K.-S. (2015). Disease Diplomacy INTERNATIONAL NORM AND GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY. USA: John Hopkins University.

Spies, Y. K. (2019). Global Diplomacy and International Society. Johannesburg: Palgrave Macmillan.

Thomas E Novontny, I. K. (2013). 21st Global Health Diplomacy. USA: World Scientific Publishing Co.Pte.Ltd.

Weizhun, M. a. (2005 ). Disaster Diplomacy: A New Diplomatic Approach?, Shanghai Institute For International Studies International Review. Beijing: Spring.

Yanyan Mochamad Yani, I. M. (2017). Pengantar Studi Keamanan. Malang: Intrans Publishing.

Zartman, R. A. (2007). Diplomacy Game Formal ModelIn International Negotiatios. Berlin: Springer.

Journals

Axelrod, R. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy : Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, 226-254.

Comfort, L. K. (2002). Disaster: Agent of Diplomacy or Change in International Affairs? Disaster Diplomacy Journal.

David Bosold and Werthes, S. (2005). Human Security in Practice: Canadian and Japanese Experiences. Human Security in Practice, 84-101.

Fathun, L. M. (2016). Bencana Hutan dalam Hubungan Internasional. AJIS, 84-107.

L.M.Fathun, W. B. (2019). DISASTER DIPLOMACY "How Disaster Affect Peace and Conflict. Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 323-336.

Remacle, E. (2008). Approaches to Human Security Japan, Canada, and Europe in Comparative Perspective. The Journal Social Science, 5-34.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v5i1.1681

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 AEGIS : Journal of International Relations

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.