DISPUTE SETTLEMENT ON THE OWNERSHIP OF TRADEMARK WITH SIMILARITY (CASE STUDY BETWEEN GUDANG GARAM VS GUDANG BARU)

Selly Marcelina, Sujana Donandi S

Abstract


One of the difficulties arising from the provisions of Law no. 15 of 2001 regarding trademark is the lack of clear guidelines to determine the criteria of a well-known and famous trademark. One of the disputes on a famous trademark was between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru that has been settled by the Supreme Court through decision No. 162 K /Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014. Problems in this research are regarding the Legal Consequences of the Verdict of the Supreme Court Number 162 K / Pdt.Sus-Hki / 2014 and how to determine the ownership of Trademark with Similarity. The methodology of this research is normative-empirical which is the combination of normative and empirical legal research. The results show that The verdict of Supreme Court Number 162 K/ Pdt.Sus-Hki/2014 determined that as long as a trademark has been registered in Indonesia, the trademark will be given a legal protection even though the trademark has similarity with other trademark that has been famous in many other countries. This verdict is not coherence with indonesian trademark law that does not admit trademark upon a trademark with similarity. The criteria of the determination of the equation basic elements in a famous brand that is the similarity of images, phenotic, names, words, letters, numbers, color arrangement or combination of such elements.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bibliography

Agus Budi Riswandi dan Syamsudin, 2004. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Budaya Hukum, (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada)

Gautama Sudargo, 1993. Hukum Merek di Indonesia, (Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti)

Lindsey Tim, 2005. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, (Bandung: P.T. Alumni)

Mahmud Peter Marzuki, 2008. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group)

Saidin OK, 2004. Aspek Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual, (Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada)

Wibosono Kunto, 2004. Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia)

Yahya Harahap 1996. Tinjauan Merek Secara Umum dan Hukum Merek di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 1992, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti)

Yuhassarie Emmy, 2005. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Perkembangannya, (Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum)

Court Verdict:

Decision District Court Surabaya Number 04 / HKI-MEREK / 2013 / PNNIAGA.SBY

Internet:

Asap, “Sengketa Merek Gudang Garam Kalahkan Gudang Baru” http://news.detik.com/read/2013/11/04/121259/2403175/10/sengketa-merek-gudang-garam-kalahkan-gudang-baru accessed on Juni 19, 2016.

Akulda. Menang Lawan Gudang Garam http://www.kaskus.co.id/thread/545c827a96bde60b0b8b456b/menang-lawan-gudang-garam-yusril-rokok-gudang-baru-punya-segmen-konsumen-sendiri/ diakses pada tanggal 22 November 2017

Klinik, Arti Persmaan Pada Pokoknya dalam UU Merek http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt560aad4d30945/arti-persamaan-pada-pokoknya-dalam-uu-merek diakses pada tanggal 23 November 201


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.