STRATEGIC DIVERGENCE IN AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY CHAINS: TESLA AND CHERY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33021/icfbe.v0i0.5715

Abstract

In today's interconnected world, global supply chains play a critical role in the production and distribution of goods and services. The globalization of supply chains has been driven by the pursuit of cost efficiencies, access to new markets, and the ability to leverage specialized capabilities from different regions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the global supply chain strategies of Tesla and Chery, focusing

on the critical factors that contribute to their success or potential failure. The method used in this study is qualitative, numerous of articles published in this topic were selected from 2014 to 2023. The investigation on key aspects such as supply chain design, sourcing strategy, production strategy, inventory management, and delivery methods to highlight the distinct approaches adopted by each company. Tesla’s supply chain is characterized by vertical integration, which grants extensive control over the production process and fosters innovation. In contrast, Chery employs a more traditional and flexible supply chain strategy, relying on partnerships and outsourcing. The analysis evaluates efficiency and scalability, cost management, quality control, risk management, and customer satisfaction as primary criteria. The results indicate that Tesla’s strategies demonstrate a commitment to control and efficiency, while Chery emphasizes flexibility and cost management. By comparing these two automakers, this paper offers insights into how different supply chain strategies can impact overall success in the competitive global automotive industry. 


References

Zhang, Q. (2014). Research on Cultural Supply Chain Integration and Invocation. Social Networking,3, 203-210.

Saleheen, F. and Habib, M. (2022). Global Supply Chain Disruption Management Post Covid 19. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 376-389.

Wang, M. (2016) Research on the Evolution of Supply Chain Finance Mode in the Internet Era. Journal of Social Sciences,4, 130-136.

Wang, J. and Peng, X. (2020). A Study of Patent Open Source Strategies Based on Open Innovation: The Case of Tesla. Journal of Social Sciences,8, 386-394.

Khatib, M. , Hammadi, A. , Hamar, A., Oraby, K. and Abdulaziz, M. (2022). How Global Supply Chain Management is Disrupting Local Supply Chain Management Case of Oil and Gas Industry in UAE. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 1067-1078.

Li, Z., De Souza, R. and Goh, M. (2016) Supply Chain Orchestration Leveraging on MNC Networks and Local Resources: Approach Strategies. Journal of Service Science and Management, 9, 303-319.

Wen, C. & Yu, J. (2024). Chery booth presents a new trend of intellectualization and globalization. China Times,014.

Gao, Y. & Li, F. (2023). Current Situation and Suggestions of Chery Supply chain Finance Platform. Financial Technology Times (08),85-88.

Li, M. (2015). Research on Identification and Evaluation of Supply chain Risk in Automotive New Product Development. Master's Thesis, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University.

Li, H., Zhang, F., He, M. (2023). The adjustment of industrial chain and supply chain of multinational companies from Tesla. Foreign Investment in China (23),64-66.

Sheng, L. & Zhang, J. (2022). Nearly 10 cities joined the battle for Tesla's second factory or "ended" in advance. China Business Journal, C05.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05