Jababeka Smart Township Super-App Case-Study: Hackathon as a mechanism for Open Innovation
Abstract
This case-study articulates the findings and implications of Hackathon which was held as a part of digital literacy training program for the implementation of a Smart City digital platform called “Jababeka Smart Township Super-App”. Firstly, the case-study explores the outputs of the Hackathon and its role as an open innovation mechanism. Secondly, it aims to explore the impact of hackathon on raising the awareness as well as the participants’ willingness to be involved and accept the Smart City implementation. Narrative analysis is employed for the first research objective and descriptive analysis employed for the second research objective where 8 participants are interviewed to provide their accounts on Hackathon and analyzed based on a technology acceptance model (TAM) framework, identifying the Perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) as the indicators of positive attitude and acceptance towards Smart City implementation. The results indicate that the Super-App as an integrated digital platform can be effectively implemented based on the Open Innovation approach resulting in 30+ community-developed applications, especially as it encourages the community to be the key players in the creation of multi-sided digital platform startups. Finally, Hackathon is found to be a useful mechanism in raising the level of understanding on the concept of Smart City and increase the stakeholders’ acceptance for Smart City implementation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Dirjen Aplikasi Informatika, KOMINFO RI, Masterplan Smart City 2017 – Gerakan Menuju 100 Smart City, 2017
E. Felipe, Z. Santana, S. Paulo, “Software Platforms for Smart Cities: Concepts, Requirements, Challenges and a Unified Reference Architecture” ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 50, No. 6, Article 78, 2017, doi:10.1145/3124391
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovi, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Vienna, Austria: Centre of Regional Science (SRF). Vienna University of Technology
Harrison, B. Eckman, R. Hamilton, P. Hartswick, J. Kalagnanam, J. Paraszczak, and P. W. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol 54:4, pp. 1–16
K. A. Achmad, L. E. Nugroho, A. Djunaedi, and Widyawan, “Smart City for Development: Towards a Conceptual Framework,” Proc. - 2018 4th Int. Conf. Sci. Technol. ICST 2018, vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018.
Kemenkominfo, ICT White Paper Indonesia 2016. 2016. [6] L. G. Anthopoulos, M. Janssen, and V. Weerakkody, “Comparing Smart Cities with different modelling approaches,” vol. 1997, pp. 525–528, 2016
Made dan Nizar, “Designing Smart City Readiness Model based on Technology- Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework” Thesis Master Computer Program, Universitas Indonesia, 2018
Mori, and A. C. (2012). Review of Sustainability Indices and Indicators: Towards a New City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol 32:1, pp. 94–106 [21]
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291).
Setijadi, E., Darmawan, A. K., Mardiyanto, R., Santosa, I., & Kristanto, T. (2019, October). A Model for Evaluation Smart City Readiness using Structural Equation Modelling: a Citizen's
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jie.v7i2.3715
DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jie.v7i2.3715.g1300
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Articles in this journal have been indexed in major research databases, including:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.