The Comparison of ISO 14001 Implementation in Indonesia Construction Companies (Case Study: PT. Waskita Karya Tbk, PT. Wijaya Karya Tbk, PT. PP (Persero) Tbk)

Filson Maratur Sidjabat; Putri Annisa Febrian

doi:10.33021/jie.v5i2.1321

The Comparison of ISO 14001 Implementation in Indonesia Construction Companies (Case Study: PT. Waskita Karya Tbk, PT. Wijaya Karya Tbk, PT. PP (Persero) Tbk)

Filson Maratur Sidjabat, Putri Annisa Febrian

Abstract

Growing the economy is a concern for President Joko Widodo's (Jokowi) government, which is why attention is so important to the construction companies. Some of the largest construction firms reported major rises throughout the value of federal contracts. Attempts to improve the infrastructure services of the organization can be made through a control system of factors affecting the performance of the company which ultimately determines the business success in achieving its goals. PT. Waskita Karya Tbk and PT. Wijaya Karya Tbk implement green construction, and green building for their environmental management quality standard, meanwhile PT PP (Persero) implement 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) theory. Regarding raw materials / products which come mainly from nature. Those three businesses have received no reports over the course of the year about the environmental business. The environmental management system then proves that improve the management standard will increase productivity and decrease the risk.

Keywords

ISO 14001, Environmental Quality, Management System, Construction Company

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Dalaeen, A. S. (2019). Evaluation of the Variables Affecting on the Cost Management and Its Correlation to the Implementation of Construction Projects. Evaluation, 11(2). 2. Apriliani, R. D., Hasibuan, Y. M., & Sidjabat, F. M. (2019). ISO 14001: 2015 and ISO 9001: 2015 Implementation in Con-struction Company. JURNALIS: Jurnal Lingkungan dan Sipil, 2(2), 126-138.3. Chiarini, A. (2019). Factors for succeeding in ISO 14001 implementation in Italian construction industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 794-803. 4. Dejkovski, N. (2016). Assessing the environmental performance of construction materials testing using EMS: An Australian study. Waste Management, 56, 359-366. 5. Djalante, S., Oneyama, H., Muhamad, L., and Arsyad, N., (2019). Toward Sustainability: Green Road Construction in Indonesia. Advances in Engineering Research, Vol 193, pp.182-187. 6. Duffield,C., Hui, F. K. P. and Wilson, S., (2019). Infrastructure Investment in Indonesia: A Focus on Ports. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers. 7. Fatima, I., and Wibisono, D., (2017). Main Performance Indicators for A Construction Company in Indonesia, Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Business and Social Studies, vol. 3 (2), pp. 77-89 8. Givano, G., and Sholichah, H. (2015). Implementation of ISO 9001:2015 And ISO 14001:2015 In Coal and Heavy Metal Mining Sector: Study Case nn Developed and Developing Country,” Jurnal Sains & Teknologi Lingkungan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–73. 9. Gunawan, M., Asyahira, R., & Sidjabat, F. M. (2020). Environmental Management System Implementation in MSMEs: A Literature Review. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 5(2). 10. Hara, A. E., Agung, C.R., and Trihartono, A. (2019), China’s Re-Construction Of Old Silk Road And Its Implications On Indonesia, Journal of Integrative International Relations, Vol. 4(1), pp. 29-44 11. J. Selih, L. M. S. Campos, A. C. Trierweiller, and D. N. de Carvalho, (2016). Environmental Management Systems In The Construction Industry: A Review, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, vol. 15 (2), pp. 453–460. 12. Mayasari, I, (2017). Penerapan Integrated Management System (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, dan OHSAS 18001) Studi Kasus Pada Produksi Kopi Instan Di PT. Nestle Indonesia – Panjang Factory, retrieved from https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/11736. 13. PT. PP (Persero) Tbk, (2020). Sustainability Report 2019, PTPP, retrieved from: https://www.ptpp.co.id/sustainability/report, in July, 2020. 14. PT. Waskita Jaya Tbk, (2019). Sustainability Report 2018. Retrieved from https://waskita.listedcompany.com/misc/SR/SR-2018.pdf. In June 2020 15. PT. Waskita Karya Tbk, (2014). Waskita Karya - Manajemen Risiko. Retreived from: https://www.waskita.co.id/pages/about/corporategovernances/riskmanagement?lang=id, in April 2020. 16. PT. Waskita Karya Tbk, (2020). Sustainability Report PT WIjaya Karya Tbk 2019. Retrieved from https://www.wika.co.id/file/sustainability-report in June 2020 17. R. Tri. (2019). Waskita Karya Catat Kontrak Baru Rp 7,2 Triliun per Mei 2019. Tempo. Retrieved from: https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1223375/waskita-karya-catat-kontrak-baru-rp-72-triliun-per-mei-2019/full&view=ok. In April 2020. 18. Ray, D., and Ing, L. Y., (2016). Addressing Indonesia’s Infrastructure Deficit,” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, vol. 52 (1), pp. 1–25, 19. Sidjabat, F. M., Habibah, R., & Pasaribu, M. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Quality and Environmental Management Strategic Implementation in Cement Industry. Media Ilmiah Teknik Lingkungan (MITL), 4(2), pp.58-70. 20. Sudjana,B.G., (2016). Road Transport of Goods In Indonesia: Infrastructure, Regulatory And Bribery Costs, Business and Entrepreneurial Review, vol. 10 (2), pp.163-184. 21. WIKA. (2008). WIKA Commits to Implement Environment Management System SML Based on ISO 14001. Retrieved from: https://www.wika.co.id/detailpost/wika-commits-to-implement-environment-management-system-sml-based-on-iso-14001. In April 2020. 22. Yin, B. C. L., Laing, R., Leon, M., & Mabon, L. (2018). An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore. Sustainable cities and society, 39, pp. 613-620.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jie.v5i2.1321

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jie.v5i2.1321.g707