Utilization of GPT-4 to Improve Education Quality Through Personalized Learning for Generation Z in Indonesia

Muhammad Fatihul Firdaus, Joseph Nugraha Wibawa, Fajri Fathur Rahman

Abstract


The Golden Generation or Generation Z, an  important part of the 2020-2035 demographic bonus, will face  unique educational challenges, such as low literacy rates and  uneven access to technology across regions[1]. To support the  potential implementation of personalized learning for  Generation Z in Indonesia, a research study was conducted to  investigate the potential use of GPT-4, an artificial intelligence  that uses the GPT language model and the latest Natural  Language Processing (NLP) technology. Quantitative,  qualitative, and literature study research methods were used to  evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of GPT-4 in the  Indonesian educational context. Data was collected from  sample testing and reference to previous GPT-4 research, and  results were analyzed using predefined evaluation methods.  The results of the analysis showed that there was an  improvement in terms of coherence and knowledge with the  GPT-4 model compared to previous models. To maximize the  potential of GPT-4 in education, there needs to be strong  support from various parties, as well as efficient adaptation to  the specific needs of students and the educational environment  in Indonesia [2]. With an integrated approach, ethics, and  safety, GPT-4 has the potential to support inclusive and  effective education for Generation Z in Indonesia.


Keywords


GPT-4, Personalized Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Education in Indonesia, Generation Z.

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

N. F. S. Fitri, “Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia,” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1617–1620, 2021.

A. Akbar and D. N. Noviani, “TANTANGAN DAN SOLUSI DALAM PERKEMBANGAN TEKNOLOGI PENDIDIKAN DI INDONESIA,” in PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN PROGRAM PASCASARJANA UNIVERSITAS PGRI PALEMBANG 03 MEI 2019, 2019, pp. 18–25.

Y. Miarso, “Peningkatan Kualifikasi Guru dalam Perspektif Teknologi Pendidikan,” Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 66–76, Jun. 2008.

L. Merari and I. K. Suyasa, “Generasi Y, Generasi Z dan Bonus Demografi Indonesia 2025,” Jun. 28, 2015.

https://www.slideshare.net/leonardmerari/generasi-y generasi-z-dan-bonus-demografi (accessed Jul. 18, 2023).

B. Sitepu, “Buku Teks Pelajaran Berbasis Aneka Sumber,” Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 95–102, 2008.

P. Pataranutaporn et al., “AI-generated characters for supporting personalized learning and well-being,” Nat Mach Intell, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1013–1022, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s42256-021-00417-9.

M. Bulger, “Personalized Learning: The Conversations We’re Not Having The Promise of Personalized Learning,” Data and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2016, [Online]. Available: www.datasociety.net

A. Brown, “Everything You’ve Wanted To Know About Gen Z But Were Afraid To Ask,” Forbes, Sep. 23, 2020. Accessed: Jul. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2020/09/2 3/everything-youve-wanted-to-know-about-gen-z but-were-afraid-to-ask/?sh=4afbd88f3d19

Hasudungan N. A. and Kurniawan Y., “Meningkatkan Kesadaran Generasi Emas Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Melalui Inovasi Digital Platform www.indonesia2045.org.,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin, vol. 1, pp. 51–58, Oct. 2018, Accessed: Jul. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available:

https://ejournal.unwaha.ac.id/index.php/snami/article/ view/263

I. Matovich and P. Srivastava, “The G20 and the Think 20 as new global education policy actors? Discursive analysis of roles and policy ideas,” Journal of International Cooperation in Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 4–20, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1108/jice

-2022-0017.

J. Cruz, “ChatGPT Timeline: Evolution and Rise of AI, Impact, Threat, and Opportunities,” Tech Times, Feb. 28, 2023. Accessed: Jul. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available:

https://www.techtimes.com/articles/287927/20230228 /chatgpt-timeline-evolution-rise-ai-impact-threat opportunities.htm

ChatGPT and Journal of International Affairs, “OPENAI’S CHATGPT AND THE PROSPECT OF LIMITLESS INFORMATION,” J Int Aff, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 379–386, 2022.

R. Dale, “NLP in a post-truth world,” Nat Lang Eng, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 319–324, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1017/S1351324917000018.

D. Erhan, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, P.-A. M. Ca, P. V. Ca, and B. Com, “Why Does Unsupervised Pre training Help Deep Learning? Pierre-Antoine Manzagol Pascal Vincent Samy Bengio,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 11, pp. 625–660, 2010.

P. Budzianowski and I. Vuli´cvuli´c, “Hello, It’s GPT-2-How Can I Help You? Towards the Use of Pretrained Language Models for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems,” Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 15–22, Nov. 2019, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-5602.

A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, and I. Sutskever, “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training,” OpenAI, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard

R. Dale, “GPT-3: What’s it good for?,” Natural Language Engineering, vol. 27, no. 1. Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–118, Jan. 01, 2021. doi: 10.1017/S1351324920000601.

L. Lucy and D. Bamman, “Gender and Representation Bias in GPT-3 Generated Stories,” Proceedings of the Workshop on Narrative Understanding, pp. 48–55, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://github.com/lucy3/gpt3_gender.

A. Rozak, S. Tinggi, and A. Islam Az-Ziyadah, “KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN DI INDONESIA,” Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197– 208, 2021.

T. Francis and F. Hoefel, “‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies,” Nov. 12, 2018. Accessed: Jul. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer

packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z and-its-implications-for-companies

“ Generation Z: Latest Characteristics, Research, and Facts,” Business Insider, 2019.

“7 Unique Characteristics of Generation Z,” Oxford Royale Academy, 2021. Accessed: Jul. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.oxford royale.com/articles/7-unique-characteristics

generation-z/

E. Abinowi, “BONUS DEMOGRAFI & MEMAHAMI ‘GENERASI Z’ INDONESIA,” Komunita: Komunikasi Pendidikan Widyatama , Jan. 05, 2021.

Kim A., McInerney Paul, Rüdiger T., and Yamakawa Naomi, “What makes Asia−Pacific’s Generation Z different?,” Jun. 29, 2020. Accessed: Jul. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth

marketing-and-sales/our-insights/what-makes-asia pacifics-generation-z-different

S. Bubeck et al., “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4,” Mar. 2023, Accessed: Jul. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712v5

OpenAI, “GPT-4 Technical Report,” Mar. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

A. Romero, “GPT-4 Will Have 100 Trillion Parameters — 500x the Size of GPT-3,” Medium. Towards Data Science., 2023, Accessed: Jul. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://towardsdatascience.com/gpt-4-will-have-100-

trillion-parameters-500x-the-size-of-gpt-3-

b98d82253

Admin, “OpenAI Merilis GPT-4, ChatGPT yang Diklaim Miliki Kemampuan Artificial Intelligence Setingkat Manusia,” FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS MEDAN AREA, Apr. 01, 2023. Accessed: Jul. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://teknik.uma.ac.id/2023/04/01/openai-merilis

gpt-4-chatgpt-yang-diklaim-miliki-kemampuan artificial-intelligence-setingkat

manusia/#:~:text=Namun%2C%20perusahaan%20me ncatat%20beberapa%20mas

A. Faiz and I. Kurniawaty, “Tantangan Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Moral,” EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 456–463, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4779.

Manongga Danny, Rahardja Untung, Sembiring Irwan, Lutfiani Ninda, and Yadiala Ahmad Bayu, “Dampak Kecerdasan Buatan Bagi Pendidikan,” ADI BISNIS DIGITAL INTERDSIPLIN, vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.34306/abdi.v3i2.792.

X. Zhai et al., “A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020,” Complexity, vol. 2021, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8812542.

R. Luckin and W. Holmes, “Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education,” Pearson Education, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299561597

T. Van der Vorst and N. Jelicic, "Artificial Intelligence in Education: Can AI bring the full potential of personalized learning to education?" in 30th European Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Towards a Connected and Automated Society", Helsinki, Finland, 16th-19th June, 2019. International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary, 2019.

X. Yang, "Accelerated Move for AI Education in China," ECNU Review of Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 347-352, 2019. [Online]. Available:

https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119878590.

[Accessed: 26-Mar-2023].

R. Aiken and R. Epstein, "Ethical guidelines for AI in education: Starting a conversation," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 11, pp. 163-176, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228600407_

Ethical_guidelines_for_AI_in_education_Starting_a_ conversation. [Accessed: 26-Mar-2023]

E. Strubell, A. Ganesh, and A. McCallum, "Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP," in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 57, pp. 3645-3650, 2019.

J. Manalu, "Penerapan Kuis Online di Sekolah BPK PENABUR," Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 60-65, 2008.

S. Vincent-Lancrin and R. van der Vlies, "Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges," OECD Education Working Papers, No. 218,

OECD Publishing, Paris, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/a6c90fa9-en. [Accessed: 26- Mar-2023].

Andriessen, J. and Sandberg, J., "Where is Education Heading and How About AI?" International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 10, pp. 130-150, 1999.

S. Sudirman, M. . Sarjan, J. . Rokhmat, and H. Hamidi, “Penilaian Pendidikan IPA secara Realtime dan Terintegrasi dengan Artificial Intelligence: Perspektif Filsafat ”, JIPP, vol. 7, no. 4b, pp. 2658– 2668, Dec. 2022.

S. Suprayekti and F. F. Hanum, “PENERAPAN TEKNOLOGI PENDIDIKAN DI LEMBAGA PERSEKOLAHAN”, PIP, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 165 - 179, Oct. 2018.

C. Linnes and B. Metcalf, “iGeneration And Their Acceptance of Technology”, IJMIS, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 11–26, Dec. 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/itfs.v8i1.4728

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 IT for Society

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


All articles in this journal are indexed in:

  


 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.