Predecessors’ Attitude toward Conflict Predictor of Family Business Sustainability

Linda Salim, Mohd. Noor Shariff, Darwina Ahmad Arshad

Abstract


Using qualitative interviews to understand the mindset of family business leaders in succession, this study proposes that attitude toward conflict is an important decision making element. A collective case studies uncover how attitude toward conflict predicts decision making during succession and influence optimism on the future of the firms. Findings of the study suggest that predecessors who welcome conflicts as a part of family firms take a more relaxed attitude toward succession, with a wider talent pool. This group are also more egalitarian in strategic decision making and optimistic toward the future of the firms. Predecessors who avoid conflict have smaller talent pool, making decisions to nominate few for the position. They is cautious, making decisions for the successors, and are pessimistic about the future of the firms. Contributions from this study are threefold. First, we introduce the use of attitude toward conflict to measure predecessors' behaviors during succession. Second, through identification of attitude toward conflict, we contribute to the literature by predicting predecessors' optimisms toward the future of the firms in the hands of the next generations. Third, this study contributes another dimension to reciprocal nepotism through discovery that family businesses upholding reciprocal nepotism behave differently.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Blumentritt, T., Mathews, T. and Marchisio, G., (2013). Game theory and family business succession: An introduction. Family Business Review, 26(1),.51-67.

Bresnahan, M.J., Donohue, W.A., Shearman, S.M. and Guan, X., (2009). Research note: Two measures of conflict orientation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(3), 365-379.

Caspersz, D. and Thomas, J., (2013). Developing Positivity to Manage. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi: 0894486513505641.

Chandler, A. D., 1980. Managerial Hierarchies, Harvard University Press.

Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W. and Barnett, T., (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family‐centered non‐economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267-293.

Chrisman, J.J., Kellermanns, F.W., Chan, K.C. and Liano, K., (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23(1), 9-26.

Colli, A., 2003. The history of family business, 1850-2000 (Vol. 47). Cambridge University Press.

Credit Suisse, (2011), Asian family businesses in report 2011, Switzerland.

Creswell, J.W., 2012. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Dawson, A. and Hjorth, D., (2012). Advancing family business research through narrative analysis. Family Business Review, 25(3), pp.339-355.

Economist 2004, 'The world's oldest companies: The business of survival', 16 December,http://www.economist.com/node/3490684>

Fukuyama, F., (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity.

Hall, P. D., 1998. A historical overview of family firms in the United States. Family Business Review, 1(1),.51-68.

Hatak, I.R. and Roessl, D.,(2015). Relational competence-based knowledge transfer within intrafamily succession: An experimental study. Family Business Review, 28(1), 10-25.

Hay Group, 2012, Family business in Asia: Breaking the third-generation curse, Singapore.

James, A.E., Jennings, J.E. and Breitkreuz, R.S., (2012. Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25(1), 87-108.

Jaskiewicz, P., Heinrichs, K., Rau, S.B. and Reay, T., (2016). To be or not to be: how family firms manage family and commercial logics in succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/etap.12146.

Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D.B. and Reay, T., (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26(2), 121-139.

Jennings, J.E., Breitkreuz, R.S. and James, A.E., (2013). When family members are also business owners: Is entrepreneurship good for families?. Family Relations, 62(3), 472-489.

Lam, W., (2011). Dancing to two tunes: Multi-entity roles in the family business succession process. International Small Business Journal, 29(5), 508-533.

Michael-Tsabari, N. and Weiss, D., 2015. Communication traps: Applying game theory to succession in family firms. Family Business Review, 28(1), pp.26-40.

Nordqvist, M. and Melin, L., (2010). The promise of the strategy as practice perspective for family business strategy research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 15-25.

Salvato, C., Minichilli, A. and Piccarreta, R., (2012). Faster route to the CEO suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency?. Family Business Review, 25(2), 206-224.

Sorenson, R.L. and Bierman, L., (2009). Family capital, family business, and free enterprise. Family Business Review, 22(3), 193-195.

Stewart, A. and Hitt, M.A., (2012). Why can’ta family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58-86.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/ijfbp.v1i1.625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Articles in this journal have been indexed in major research databases, including:


 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.