Capital Structure for Mature Family Companies in the Indonesian Stock Exchange

pandu adi cakranegara

Abstract


Not all family companies choose to float on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. By being an open company an securities company must comply with various regulations from the supervisory institution that makes its various financial decisions limited by regulations and covenants. Limited financial decision making is a double-edged sword. On the one hand this can force the company to make more responsible decisions but on the other hand this independence can make the company lag behind other companies that are more flexible in making financial decisions. There are at least two parties that have an interest in the company's cash flow, namely the lender and the equity investor. On the one hand the company needs funds to carry out the company's plans. This study examines how firms choose capital structure and its impact on firms. The specialty in this study is the family company that has reached the established phase listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The findings of this study are that mature family companies have a tendency to maximize cash flow and maintain a dominant position in capital structure and use short-term debt that is less binding or dealing with large banks.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Cooper, I. A., & Nyborg, K. G. (2007). Valuing the debt tax shield. NHH Dept. of Finance & Management Science Discussion Paper, (2007/15).

Chirico, F., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 487-504.

Ehrhardt, M. C., & Brigham, E. F. (2016). Corporate finance: A focused approach. Cengage learning.

Ertimur, Y., Sletten, E., & Sunder, J. (2014). Large shareholders and disclosure strategies: Evidence from IPO lockup expirations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(1), 79-95.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Ghonyan, L. (2017). Advantages and Disadvantages of Going Public and Becoming a Listed Company. Available at SSRN 2995271.

Handayani, M., Farlian, T., & Ardian, A. (2019). Firm Size, Market Risk, and Stock Return: Evidence from Indonesian Blue Chip Companies. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 6(2), 171-182.

Miao, J. (2005). Optimal capital structure and industry dynamics. The Journal of finance, 60(6), 2621-2659.

Minton, B. A., & Wruck, K. H. (2002). Financial conservatism: Evidence on capital structure from low leverage firms.

Penman, S. H., & Penman, S. H. (2007). Financial statement analysis and security valuation (Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Serrasqueiro, Z., & Caetano, A. (2015). Trade-Off Theory versus Pecking Order Theory: capital structure decisions in a peripheral region of Portugal. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 445-466.

Sharma, P., & Salvato, C. (2011). Commentary: Exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1199-1205.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/ijfbp.v3i1.1159

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Articles in this journal have been indexed in major research databases, including:


 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.