Political Parties in Indonesia and the Internet: A comparative analysis

Muhammad Sigit Andhi Rahman; Ella S Prihatini

doi:10.33021/aegis.v3i2.711

Political Parties in Indonesia and the Internet: A comparative analysis

Muhammad Sigit Andhi Rahman, Ella S Prihatini

Abstract

This is the first such study of the use of Internet by political parties in Indonesia. It also documents parties’ websites performance index and online popularity for campaigning in 2019. The purpose of this comparative study is to look at how the Internet was used by Indonesian political parties approaching the 2019 elections. Internet campaign consists of two parts: online presence through political party website, and political marketing through social media. Total of 16 parties participating the elections next year were examined for how they are utilizing official websites and social media platforms. We created an index based on list of website features (scoring system) and then classify it into 4 variables (information provision, mobilization, engagement, and technological sophistication) containing 43 features. We also visualise the descriptive statistical analysis on parties’ social media accounts using RStudio software. The study found that despite half of Indonesian national population is using the Internet, political parties were not yet achieving their maximum potential in using the digital media to disseminate political messages and propaganda. The quality of most of the websites have been subpar. In addition, the quality seems to have no relationship with the financial resources and the current parliamentary size of political parties. On average, official social media accounts run by parties has only been used in the last 3.25 years. Well-established older parties in Indonesia continue to engage with their constituents without heavily relying on social media. Yet, this situation is very likely to change in the future as parties’ elites are now beginning to look into this platform as they seek out to the millennials for electoral support.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alami, A.N., 2013. Menakar Kekuatan Media Sosial Menjelang Pemilu 2014 [Measuring the Strength of Social Media Ahead of the 2014 Election]. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1), pp.85–99.

Aspinall, E. & Sukmajati, M. eds., 2015. Politik uang di Indonesia: patronase dan klientelisme pada pemilu legislatif 2014 [Money politics in Indonesia: patronage and clientelism in the 2014 legislative elections], Yogyakarta: PolGov UGM.

Beers, S., 2014. Shallow or Rational Public Spheres? Indonesian Political Parties in the Twitter-Sphere. The Journal of the South East Asia, 6(2), pp.1–23. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/DOI 10.7603/s40931-014-0001-8.

Bimber, B., 2014. Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), pp.130–150. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691.

Cogburn, D.L. & Espinoza-Vasquez, F.K., 2011. From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2), pp.189–213. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2011.540224.

D’Alessio, D., 1997. Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US election. Electoral Studies, 16(4), pp.489–500. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00044-9.

Danielson, D.R., 2006. Web Credibility. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, pp.713–721. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch107 [Accessed December 11, 2018].

Enli, G.S. & Moe, H. eds., 2017. Social Media and Election Campaigns: Key Tendencies and Ways Forward, New York: Routledge.

Farrell, H., 2012. The consequences of the Internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, pp.35–52. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815.

Fogg, B.J., 2002. Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility, Stanford University, Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. Available at: http://credibility.stanford.edu/.

Gadekar, R., Thakur, K. & Ang, P.H., 2011. Web sites for e-electioneering in Maharashtra and Gujarat, India. Internet Research, 21(4), pp.435–457. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/888254227.

Gainous, J. & Wagner, K.M., 2013a. Social Media—The New Dinner Table? In Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gainous, J. & Wagner, K.M., 2013b. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.

Gerodimos, R. & Justinussen, J., 2015. Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), pp.113–132. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.982266.

Gibson, R.K., 2004. Web campaigning from a global perspective. Asia-Pacific Review, 11(1), pp.95–126.

Gibson, R.K. & McAllister, I., 2015. Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning. Political studies, 63(3), pp.529–547. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107.

Gibson, R.K. & Ward, S., 2002. Virtual Campaigning: Australian Parties and the Impact of the Internet. Australian journal of political science, 37(1), pp.99–129. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603100220119047.

Gibson, R., Ward, S. & Lusoli, W., 2002. The internet and political campaigning: the new medium comes of age? Representations , 39(3), pp.166–180. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344890308523221.

Harfoush, R., 2009. Yes We Did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand, Indianapolis: New Riders.

Johansson, A.C., 2016a. Social Media and Politics in Indonesia. Stockholm School of Economics Asia Working Paper, 42, pp.1–44. Available at: https://swopec.hhs.se/hascer/papers/hascer2016-042.pdf.

Johansson, A.C., 2016b. Tweeting for Power: Social Media and Political Campaigning in Indonesia. Stockholm School of Economics Asia Working Paper, 42. Available at: https://swopec.hhs.se/hascer/papers/hascer2016-043.pdf.

Keusgen, T., 2016. Indonesia, SE Asia’s digital powerhouse. The Jakarta Post. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2016/08/09/indonesia-se-asias-digital-powerhouse.html [Accessed December 12, 2018].

Koc-Michalska, K. et al., 2016. The normalization of online campaigning in the web.2.0 era. European journal of disorders of communication: the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London, 31(3), pp.331–350. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116647236.

KPU, 2014. Buku Data dan Infografik Pemilu Anggota DPR RI & DPD RI 2014 [Book of Data and Infographic General Election of DPR RI & DPD RI 2014], Available at: http://www.kpu.go.id/koleksigambar/Buku_Pemilu_2014_Dalam_Angka_ACC_Upload.pdf [Accessed 2016].

Lassen, D.S. & Brown, A.R., 2011. Twitter: The Electoral Connection? Social science computer review, 29(4), pp.419–436. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439310382749.

Lilleker, D.G. et al., 2011. Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), pp.195–213. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323111416182.

Lim, M., 2013a. Many Clicks but Little Sticks: Social Media Activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), pp.636–657. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386.

Lim, M., 2013b. The Internet and Everyday Life in Indonesia: A New Moral Panic? Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 169(1), pp.133–147. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134379-12340008.

Massola, J., 2018. Facebook is the internet for many people in south-east Asia. The Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/facebook-is-the-internet-for-many-people-in-south-east-asia-20180322-p4z5nu.html [Accessed December 13, 2018].

Mietzner, M., 2008. Comparing Indonesia’s Party Systems of the 1950s and the Post-Suharto Era: From Centrifugal to Centripetal Inter-Party Competition. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 39(3), pp.431–453.

Naseer, M.M. & Mahmood, K., 2016. Ready for e-electioneering? Empirical evidence from Pakistani political parties’ websites. Internet Research, 26(4), pp.901–918. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2014-0099.

Park, H.M. & Perry, J.L., 2008. Do Campaign Web Sites Really Matter in Electoral Civic Engagement?: Empirical Evidence From the 2004 Post-Election Internet Tracking Survey. Social science computer review, 26(2), pp.190–212. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439307309026.

Perdana, P.P., 2018. Dekati Generasi Milenial, Airlangga Perbaiki Manajemen Sosmed Golkar [Approaching Millennials, Airlangga Refines Social Media Management at Golkar]. KOMPAS.com. Available at: https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/18/22515141/dekati-generasi-milenial-airlangga-perbaiki-manajemen-sosmed-golkar [Accessed December 3, 2018].

Porten-Cheé, P., 2013. The Use of Party Web Sites and Effects on Voting: The Case of the European Parliamentary Elections in Germany in 2009. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(3), pp.310–325. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2013.803946.

Prihatini, E.S., 2018. Women’s representation in Asian parliaments: a QCA approach. Contemporary Politics, pp.1–23. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2018.1520057.

Ramadan, H.R., 2018a. KPU Tetapkan DPT Pemilu 2019 Sebesar 187.781.884 [KPU Sets 2019 Election DPT of 187,781,884]. Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Available at: https://kpu.go.id/index.php/post/read/2018/6551/KPU-Umumkan-Daftar-Caleg-Mantan-Terpidana-Korupsi/berita [Accessed September 27, 2018].

Ramadan, H.R., 2018b. Tim Kampanye, Pelaksana Kampanye, dan Akun Media Sosial Peserta Pemilu Tahun 2019 (Tingkat Pusat) [Campaign Team, Campaign Implementers, and Social Media Accounts for 2019 Election Participants (National Level)]. KPU. Available at: https://kpu.go.id/index.php/pages/detail/2018/958 [Accessed December 9, 2018].

Roberts, S.P., 2015. Online Campaigning in Russia: Evidence from the 2011 State Duma Election. Europe-Asia studies, 67(8), pp.1228–1250. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2015.1074658.

Stromer-Galley, J., 2014. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tapsell, R., 2017a. Media Power in Indonesia : Oligarchs, Citizens and the Digital Revolution, London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Tapsell, R., 2017b. The political economy of digital media. In E. Jurriens & E. Jurriens, eds. Digital Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore, pp. 56–72. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/9789814786003-010.

We Are Social, 2018. Digital Report 2018. www.wearesocial.com. Available at: https://digitalreport.wearesocial.com/ [Accessed December 8, 2018].

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v3i2.711