Respon Indonesia terhadap Kebijakan RED II Uni Eropa

Nelda Zahra Amany; Fredy B. L. Tobing

doi:10.33021/aegis.v8i2.5531

Respon Indonesia terhadap Kebijakan RED II Uni Eropa

Nelda Zahra Amany, Fredy B. L. Tobing

Abstract

Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) adalah kebijakan yang dibuat oleh Uni Eropa yang bertujuan untuk mengurangi dampak buruk lingkungan serta mendorong penggunaan energi terbarukan, salah satunya adalah dengan melakukan pembatasan Crude Palm Oil (CPO) dan penilaian terhadap pengelolaan kelapa sawit. Hal ini berdampak kepada Indonesia sebagai salah satu negara pengekspor kelapa sawit terbesar di dunia, dan mempengaruhi dinamika perdagangan internasional Indonesia. Indonesia merasa kebijakan Uni Eropa ini tidak sejalan dengan norma utama prinsip perdagangan WTO serta melanggar beberapa pasal dalam General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade atau GATT 1994 karena dianggap mengandung unsur diskriminasi terhadap kelapa sawit Indonesia. Tulisan ini melihat dari sudut pandang Indonesia dengan melihat bagaimana respon Indonesia terhadap kebijakan RED II Uni Eropa. Dalam menjawab pertanyaan penelitian tersebut, tulisan ini menggunakan konsep diplomasi ekonomi untuk menganalisis strategi dan upaya yang dilakukan Indonesia dengan skema yang terstruktur. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah kualitatif dengan sumber data yang berasal dari dokumen resmi RED II, artikel dan website yang membahas permasalahan terkait.

Kata Kunci: Kelapa Sawit, Indonesia, Perdagangan Internasional, RED II, Uni Eropa

Keywords

Kelapa Sawit, Indonesia, Perdagangan Internasional, RED II, Uni Eropa.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku

Bayne, N., & Woolcock, S. (2017). The New Economic Diplomacy (4th editio, Issue september 2016). Routledge.

Bergeijk, P. A. G. van, Okano-Heijmans, M., & Melissen, J. (2011). Economic Diplomacy: Economic and Political Perspectives. In Economic Diplomacy. Leidon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09839-3

Berridge, G. R., & James, A. (2003). Dictionary of Diplomacy. Palgrave-Macmillan.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Rana, K. S. (2007). Economic Diplomacy: The Experience of Developing Countries. Ashgate, 201–220.

Artikel Jurnal

Arifin, B., Audina, K., & Putri, P. (2019). Indonesian Government Strategies On Obtaining Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Market Access To European Union Countries Over The EU Parliament Resolution On Palm Oil And Deforestation Of Rainforest. Andalas Journal of International Studies|, 8(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.8.2.203-223.2019

Choiruzzad, S. A. B. (2019). Save Palm Oil, Save the Nation: Palm Oil Companies and the Shaping of Indonesia’s National Interest. Asian Politics and Policy, 11(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12431

Choiruzzad, S. A. B., Tyson, A., & Varkkey, H. (2021). The ambiguities of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil certification : internal incoherence , governance rescaling and state transformation. Asia Europe Journal, 19, 189–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-020-00593-0

Cisneros, E., Kis-Katos, K., & Nuryartono, N. (2021). Palm oil and the politics of deforestation in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 108, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102453

Coelho, S. T., Perecin, D., Rei, F., Escobar, J. F., Freiria, R. C., & Kimura, W. J. (2022). Bioenergy Policies Worldwide. Comprehensive Renewable Energy (Second Edition), 5, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819727-1.00040-6

Heimann, T., Argueyrolles, R., Reinhardt, M., Schuenemann, F., Söder, M., & Delzeit, R. (2024). Phasing Out Palm and Soy Oil Biodiesel in the EU: What is the Benefit? GCB Bioenergy, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13115

Jamilah, J., Zahara, H., Kembaren, E. T., Budi, S., & Nurmala, N. (2022). Market Share Analysis and Export Performance of Indonesian Crude Palm Oil in the EU Market. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12690

Khairiza, F., & Kusumasari, B. (2020). Analyzing political marketing in Indonesia: A palm oil digital campaign case study. Forest and Society, 4(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i2.9576

Mayr, S., Hollaus, B., & Madner, V. (2021). Palm Oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green? Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 30(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12386

Milner, H. V. (1999). The Political Economy of International Trade. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2, 91–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.91

Montratama, I., Ardian, F., Ramadhan, I., Ingpraja, A. P., Musri, M. N., Syah, R. A., Fadli, A., & Brillianti, F. (2018). Strategi Diplomasi Kelapa Sawit Indonesia.

Muzayyin, Y., Masyhuri, & Darwanto, D. H. (2022). Has Indonesia Been Unable To Compete in the World Biodiesel Trade During the Implementation of the Biodiesel Blending Mandate? International Journal of Energy Production and Management, 7(4), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V7-N4-331-337

Ramadhan, I., Syah, R. A., & Mahmud, Z. K. (2022). Indonesia’S Economic Diplomacy in the Context of the EU’s Palm Oil Embargo: Reaching Out To Turkey As an Alternative Market. Janus.Net, 13(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.2.13

Rum, I. A., Tukker, A., de Koning, A., & Yusuf, A. A. (2022). Impact assessment of the EU import ban on Indonesian palm oil: Using environmental extended multi-scale MRIO. Science of the Total Environment, 853(May), 158695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158695

Sihotang, E. D. (2022). Analysis of Discriminatory Measures From European Union Renewable Energy Directive II To Indonesia as a Palm Oil Producer Country. Indonesia Law Review, 12(3), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.3

Sinaga, V. S., & Foekh, R. M. E. (2021). Kebijakan Uni Eropa Red II Dan Delegated Act Terhadap Perdagangan Produk Kelapa Sawit Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.197

Tandra, H., & Suroso, A. I. (2023). The determinant, efficiency, and potential of Indonesian palm oil downstream export to the global market. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2189671

Tandra, H., Suroso, A. I., Syaukat, Y., & Najib, M. (2021). Indonesian Oil Palm Export Market Share and Competitiveness to European Union Countries: Is The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) Influential? Jurnal Manajemen Dan Agribisnis, 18(3), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.18.3.342

Tyson, A., & Meganingtyas, E. (2022). The Status of Palm Oil Under the European Union’s Renewable Energy Directive: Sustainability or Protectionism? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 58(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1862411

Valentina, A., & Kusumawardani, N. (2016). Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO), A Way to Reach The European Union Renewable Energy Directive (EU RED) 2009 and Boosting Indonesian Palm Oil Market to European Union (EU) 2009-2014. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v1i1.83

Varkkey, H. (2021). Transboundary Environmental Governance in the Eu and Southeast Asia: Contesting Hybridity in the Biofuels and Palm Oil Regimes. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 9(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.21512/JAS.V9I2.7757

Waters, K., Altiparmak, S. O., Shutters, S. T., & Thies, C. (2024). The Green Mirage: The EU’s Complex Relationship with Palm Oil Biodiesel in the Context of Environmental Narratives and Global Trade Dynamics. Energies, 17(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17020343

Webpages

ASEAN Secretariat. (2021). First Meeting of the Joint Working Group on Palm Oil between the European Union and Relevant ASEAN Member Countries. https://asean.org/first-meeting-of-the-joint-working-group-on-palm-oil-between-the-european-union-and-relevant-asean-member-countries/

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2012). Ekspor Minyak Kelapa Sawit Menurut Negara Tujuan Utama. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/1/MTAyNiMx/ekspor-minyak-kelapa-sawit-menurut-negara-tujuan-utama--2012-2022.html

European Commission. (2016). Renewable Energy – Recast to 2030 (RED II). EU Science Hub. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/welcome-jec-website/reference-regulatory-framework/renewable-energy-recast-2030-red-ii_en

GAPKI. (2018). Harapkan Perdagangan Minyak Sawit Yang Adil & Tidak Diskriminatif. https://gapki.id/news/2018/05/17/harapkan-perdagangan-minyak-sawit-yang-adil-tidak-diskriminatif/

GAPKI. (2019a). GAPKI : Siap Lawan & Beri Perhatian Penuh Atas Diskriminasi Sawit Uni Eropa. https://gapki.id/news/2019/04/18/gapki-siap-lawan-beri-perhatian-penuh-atas-diskriminasi-sawit-uni-eropa/

GAPKI. (2019b). Sekjen GAPKI : Strategi Lawan Kampanye Negatif Sawit, Jangan Ikuti Irama Uni Eropa! https://gapki.id/news/2019/04/22/sekjen-gapki-strategi-lawan-kampanye-negatif-sawit-jangan-ikuti-irama-uni-eropa/

KEMENLU. (2021). Capaian Diplomasi Indonesia dalam Mendorong Minyak Nabati yang Berkelanjutan. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/2105/berita/capaian-diplomasi-indonesia-dalam-mendorong-minyak-nabati-yang-berkelanjutan

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2019). Lawan Diskriminasi Sawit Oleh UE , Menko Perekonomian Pimpin DELRI Sambangi Brussels. https://www.ekon.go.id/unduh/publikasi/1103/lawan-diskriminasi-sawit-oleh-ue-menko-perekonomian-pimpin-delri-sambangi-brussels

Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2019a). Indonesia Siap Hadapi Aturan EU-RED II di WTO. https://www.kemendag.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/indonesia-siap-hadapi-aturan-eu-red-ii-di-wto

Kementerian Perdagangan RI. (2019b). Lawan Diskriminasi Kelapa Sawit, Indonesia Gugat Uni Eropa di WTO. https://www.kemendag.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/lawan-diskriminasi-kelapa-sawit-indonesia-gugat-uni-eropa-di-wto-3

TRT World. (n.d.). Why Indonesia and Malaysia are calling out EU “discrimination.” https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/why-indonesia-and-malaysia-are-calling-out-eu-discrimination-64314

U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2024). Production - Palm Oil. https://fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity/4243000

World Trade Organization. (n.d.). European Union — Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds593_e.htm

World Trade Organization. (1995). Technical Barriers to Trade. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_e.htm

Berita/Artikel Online

Amri, Q. (2018). ISPO Tidak Diakui, Petani Sawit Protes Pernyataan Dubes Eropa. Sawitindonesia. https://sawitindonesia.com/ispo-tidak-diakui-petani-sawit-protes-pernyataan-dubes-eropa/

Bagaskara. (2018). Mengenal ISPO serta Manfaat, Tujuan, dan Cara Sertifikasi. Mutusertification. https://mutucertification.com/mengenal-ispo-manfaat-sertifikasi/#:~:text=ISPO%2C singkatan dari Indonesian Sustainable,dari industri kelapa sawit Indonesia.

CNN Indonesia. (2019). Buntut Kampanye Hitam, Ekspor CPO RI ke Uni Eropa Anjlok. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190415204434-92-386648/buntut-kampanye-hitam-ekspor-cpo-ri-ke-uni-eropa-anjlok

Gumilar, P. (2019). RED II : Gapki Siapkan Upaya Delegasi untuk Sanggah Tudingan Uni Eropa Soal Sawit. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190226/99/893636/red-ii-gapki-siapkan-upaya-delegasi-untuk-sanggah-tudingan-uni-eropa-soal-sawit

Info Sawit. (2024). Lahan Sawit Bersetifikasi ISPO Capai 4,09 Juta Ha, Libatkan 816 Pelaku Sawit Termasuk Petani. https://mutuhijau.com/index.php/layanan/ispo/ispo

Ivander, J. (2021). Diplomasi Sawit. https://www.astra-agro.co.id/2019/04/11/diplomasi-sawit/

Mutu Hijau. (n.d.). INDONESIAN SUSTAINABLE PALM OIL (ISPO). https://mutuhijau.com/index.php/layanan/ispo/ispo

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v8i2.5531