Penentuan Program Pengembangan IKM Dengan Pendekatan Multi Criteria Decision Making: Perspektif Faktor Internal

Johan K Runtuk

doi:10.33021/jie.v3i1.493

Penentuan Program Pengembangan IKM Dengan Pendekatan Multi Criteria Decision Making: Perspektif Faktor Internal

Johan K Runtuk

Abstract

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role for Indonesian economy. However, many SMEs have difficulty developing its business. The various SME development programs that are provided are generally less impactful, ineffective, and unsustainable. Therefore, a special study is needed to determine the development program for SMEs. This research integrates two methods in multi criteria decision making (MCDM), i.e. decision-making method of trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and analytic network process (ANP) method to determine which internal factors that are most important for SMEs development. Based on the data obtained from the experts and the results of the analysis, internal factor that has biggest weight for the development of SMEs are managerial quality, investment, business owner characteristics, and entrepreneurial orientation; consecutively. Moreover, technology awareness and the determination and achievement of targets (sub-factor of managerial quality), technological development (sub-factor of investment), and membership/involvement in business/association groups (sub-factor of business owner characteristics) are significant factor for SMEs development. SMEs development programs should focus on improving these factors so that Indonesian SMEs can experience sustainable growth.
Keywords: development programs, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), analytic network process (ANP), internal factors.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (1987), “An empirical examination of small firm growth”, Economics Letters, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 363–366.

Almus, M. and Nerlinger, E.A. (2000), “Testing ‘Gibrat’s Law’ for Young Firms: Empirical Results for West Germany”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 15 No. 1.

Barney, J.B. and Mackey, T.B. (2005), “Testing resource-based theory”, Research methodology in strategy and management, Vol. 2, pp. 1–13.

Best, M.H. and Humphries, J. (2003), “Edith Penrose: a feminist economist?”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 47–73.

Calvo, J.L. (2006), “Testing Gibrat’s Law for Small, Young and Innovating Firms”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 117–123.

Clark, P. and Blundel, R. (2007), “Penrose, critical realism and the evolution of business knowledge: A methodological reappraisal”, Management & Organizational History, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 45–62.

Connell, C.M. (2008), “Firm and Government as Actors in Penrose’s Process Theory of International Growth: Implications for the Resource-Based View and Ownership–Location– Internationalisation Paradigm”, Australian Economic History Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 170–194.

De Oliveira Wilk, E. and Fensterseifer, J.E. (2003), “Use of resource-based view in industrial cluster strategic analysis”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 No. 9, pp. 995–1009.

Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J. and Perren, L. (1998), “Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review”, Technovation, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39–55.

Irjayanti, M. and Azis, A.M. (2012), “Barrier Factors and Potential Solutions for Indonesian SMEs”, Procedia Economics and Finance, International Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises Development, Vol. 4, pp. 3–12.

Jacobsen, L. (2013), “On Robinson, Penrose, and the resource-based view”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 125–147.

Kay, N.M. (2005), “Penrose and the growth of multinational firms”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 99–112.

Lim, S.K. (2009), Dynamic resouce-based view of entrepreneurial firm growth, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P. and Girma, S. (2011), “Organic and Acquisitive Growth: Re-examining, Testing and Extending Penrose’s Growth Theory”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 48–74.

McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J. and Davidsson, P. (2006), “A resource-based view on organic and acquired growth”, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 9, pp. 175–194.

Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of The Growth of The Firm, OXFORD University Press.

Pettus, M.L. (2001), “The Resource-Based View as a Developmental Growth Pprocess: Evidence From The Deregulated Trucking Industry.”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 878–896.

Saaty, T.L., (1999), Decision Making for Leaders, 3rd ed., RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA.

Sandee, H., Isdijoso, B. and Sulandjari, S. (2002), SME clusters in Indonesia: An analysis of growth dynamics and employment conditions, Intl Labour Organisation.

Soininen, J., Martikainen, M., Puumalainen, K. and Kyläheiko, K. (2012), “Entrepreneurial orientation: Growth and profitability of Finnish small- and medium-sized enterprises”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 140 No. 2, pp. 614–621.

Tan, D. and Mahoney, J.T. (2007), “The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries: The Penrose effect”, Management International Review, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 259–279.

Teruel-Carrizosa, M. (2008), “Gibrat’s law and the learning process”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 355–373.

The World Bank. (2012), Mempercepat Laju: Revitalisasi Pertumbuhan di Sektor Manufaktur Indonesia, World Bank.

Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32 (4), 1028–1044.

Westhead, P., Wright, M. and Ucbasaran, D. (2001), “The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view”, Journal of business venturing, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 333–358.

Zubac, A., Hubbard, G. and Johnson, L.W. (2010), “The RBV and value creation: a managerial perspective”, European Business Review, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 515–538.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jie.v3i1.493

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/jie.v3i1.493.g289