EXPLORING THE APPLICATION OF THE THREE PILLARS OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND CLASSROOM CULTURE

Aurelio D. Fancubila

Abstract


Student engagement is a great factor that influences a good classroom culture and emboldens students to learn and thrive. Having a good classroom culture will help students learn the best of their abilities and increase their achievements. Utilizing a descriptive correlational approach, this study aimed to determine the degree of application of the three (3) pillars of student engagement and classroom culture of 332 randomly selected Junior High teachers. A validated and reliability tested questionnaire was used to gather the needed data from randomly selected respondents. Statistical tools used to analyze and interpret the data were frequency count, percentage, mean, t-test, analysis of variance, and Pearson r. The findings of the study revealed that respondents themselves perceived their application of the three pillars of student engagement and classroom culture as “very high” respectively. There was no significant difference in the degree of application of the three (3) pillars of student engagement when respondents were grouped according to their sex, age, and highest educational attainment, except in length of service. There was no significant difference existed in the level of classroom culture when Junior High School teachers were grouped according to sex, age, highest educational attainment, and length of service. Generally, the degree application of the three (3) pillars of student engagement is significantly related to the level of classroom culture. Thus, student engagement fosters positive classroom culture. It is therefore recommended that teachers should highly utilize student engagement such as cognitive, affective and creative into their teaching practices to promote positive classroom culture, an environment conducive to learning and self-development.


Keywords


Student Engagement, Affective Engagement, Classroom Culture, Cognitive Engagement, Creative Engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, J. M., Wright, S., Cranston, N., Watson, J., Beswick, K., & Hay, I. (2018). Raising levels of school student engagement and retention in rural, regional and disadvantaged areas: is it a lost cause? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(4), 409-425.

Bernstein, L (2022, April 8). What is Student Engagement and Why Does it Matter? Xelllo. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://xello.world/en/blog/student-engagement/what-is-student-engagement/

Can, Ş., & Kaymakcı, G. (2015). Natural Sciences Teachers' Skills of Managing the Constructivist Learning Environment. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(3).

Carstensen, B., Lindner, C., & Klusmann, U. (2021). Satisfaction, Enthusiasm, and Well-Being of Student Teachers: A Question of Appreciation?

Chory, R.M., Zhaleh, K., & Estaji, M. (2022) Perceptions of instructor injustice in COVID-19-imposed online courses: EFL students’ perceptions and experiences in focus. Communication Quarterly 70:5, pages 469-494.

Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016.

Fredricks, J. A. (2014). Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating classrooms of deep learning. Corwin Press.

Ginting, D. (2021). Student Engagement and Factors Affecting Active Learning in English Language Teaching. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society. 10.29408/veles.v5i2.3968

Hussein, A. A. (2016). Classroom culture and its impact on English language teaching. US-China Education Review, 6(11), 650-656.

Ivory, G., Rodríguez, C., & McClellan, R. (2015). Promoting the success of every student with integrity, with fairness, and in an ethical manner: What if the way is not clear? In Quandaries of the Small-District Superintendency (pp. 113-130). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

Kane, L. (2004). Educators, learners and active learning methodologies. International journal of lifelong education.

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3), 517-528.

Mac Iver, M. A. (2013). Early warning indicators of high school outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 18(1), 1-6

Neff, L.S. (N.D.). Learning Theories Website. Retrieved September 16, 2023, from https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/lsn/educator/edtech/learningtheorieswebsite/vygotsky.htm

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/philippines-a0882a2d/

Owen, N. (Ed.). (2011). Placing students at the heart of creative learning. Routledge

Parsons, J. (2011). Student Engagement. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1208459/student-engagement/1761568/

Pedler, M; Yeigh, T; Hudson, S. (2020) The Teachers’ Role in Student Engagement: A Review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, v45 n3 Article 4 p48-62 Mar 202 https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Roleofteachersinstudentcognitiveengagement&ft=on&id=EJ1256902

Pendleton, R (2005). Student Performance objectives. http://cte-ects.info/EVOC501DS/studentpo.html

Pomerantz, E. M., & Kempner, S. G. (2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Development Psychology, 49 (11), 2040-2046.

Republic of the Philippines. (2020). Republic Act No. 11510, December 2020

Reschly, A. L., Pohl, A. J., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2020). Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school. Springer Nature

Rotgans, J.I., Schmidt, H.G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Adv in Health Sci Educ 16, 465–479 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9

Sharma, B. R., & Bhaumik, P. K. (2013). Student Engagement and Its Predictors: An Exploratory Study in an Indian Business School. Global Business Review, 14(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150912466364

Smart, J. B & Marshall, J. C., (2013) Interactions Between Classrooms Discourse, Teacher Questioning, and Student Cognitive Engagement in Middle School Science, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24:2, 249-267, DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9297-9

Shernoff, D. J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Measuring student engagement in high school classrooms and what we have learned. Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement, 77-96

Soderstrom, N. C. & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review https://bjorklab.psych.ucla.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/13/2016/11/soderstorm_ra_learningvsperformance.pdf

Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and creativity, 23, 58- 66.

Sukor, R. Fauzi, A. Nor-Khaizura,M-A-R. A.H, F. (2021). Relationship Between Students' Engagement with Academic Performance Among Non-Food Science Students Enrolled in Food Science Course. Journal of Turkish Science Education. VL - 18 DO - 10.36681/tused.2021.95

William, L. (2016). Positive Behavior Management in Early Years Settings. p. (11). https://books.google.com.ph/

Wood, T.D. (2012). Teacher Perceptions of Gender-Based differences among elementary teachers. International Electronic Journal Elementary Education, 2012, 4(2), 317-345

Wornyo, A. A., Klu, E. K., & Motlhaka, H. (2018). Authentic learning: Enhancing learners’ academic literacy skills. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 56-62.

Yang, Y., Liu, K., Li, M. & Li, S. (2022). Students’ affective engagement, parental involvement, and teacher support in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in China, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54:sup1, S148-S164, DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1922104

Yeen-Jua, H. T., Maia, N., Kiana, N. T., Jinga, K. W., Wena, L. K., & Haw, L. C. (2014). Developing creative and critical thinking skills in an authentic learning environment. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 3.

Zhang, Y. Tian, Y. Yao, L. Duan, C. Sun, X. Niu,G. (2023). Teaching presence promotes learner affective engagement: The roles of cognitive load and need for cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, Volume 129,104167, ISSN 0742-051X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104167Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). The effects of service quality on student loyalty: the mediating role of student satisfaction. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-04-2014-0031




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/ideas.v4i1.5614

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.33021/ideas.v4i1.5614.g2033

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aurelio D. Fancubila

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office:

President University Master of Technology Management Program
Jalan Ki Hajar Dewantara Mekarmukti
Cikarang Utara, Bekasi, Jawa Barat
Indonesia


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.